wausfpp.org


Fairchild (LCPJ), February 2004

Text Source

Fairchild, Paul. "Editorial." Peace Monitor II.70 (Lawrence, KS: Lawrence Coalition for Peace and Justice, http://www.lcpj.org, newsletter. February 2004): http://www.lcpj.org/monitor/PM0402.PDF.


Message Unit 1 - an example of patriotized history

The US government was not the authority to make rulings about which countries had certain weapons, nor was the US government the authority to take action about any such weapons in other countries. The US government was forbidden from attacking other countries regardless of what it thought or when it thought it.


In 2003, international law did not give the US or any other country the authority to make determinations about who had weapons, and it forbade all countries from attacking other countries except in self-defense if an armed attack had occurred.


If you have legal authority over an area, then the legality of your violent actions against people in that area might depend upon what you knew about them and when you knew it. But if you do not have legal authority over an area, and you still took violent action against people in that area, then it makes no difference what you knew or when you knew it.


International law did not give the US the authority to determine who had certain weapons or to attack those who did.

The US government owns the right to attack on Iraqi soil if the US government decides Iraq has certain weapons.

text:

What we knew and did not know on March 19 remains the basis for judging this war, not what we may discover in the future.